Moi zdravyi smysl menia ne obmanul.
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86920.pdf
9 FAM 40.1 N2.2-1 Out of Wedlock Child May Qualify as
Stepchild
(CT:VISA-1000; 09-03-2008)
INA 101(b)(1)(B) makes no distinction between children born in wedlock and
those born out of wedlock in respect to stepparent/stepchild relationship. All that
is required is that the child be under the age of 18 at the time the marriage
creating the status of stepchild occurred. A stepparent/stepchild relationship can
also be established for children who were born subsequent to the marriage
between the natural parent and the stepparent. For example, a child who is born
as a result of an out of wedlock relationship between a married man and another
woman would qualify as the stepchild of the married man’s wife, since the child
was under 18 when the marriage between the natural parent and the stepparent
occurred.
Vnebrachnyi rebenok, rojdennyi odnim iz roditelei vo vremia braka, - schitaetsia stepchild dlia supruga roditelia.
требование американского законодательства указывать чужих детей
Ia ponimaiu vashe nedoumenie. Prikladyvat’ foto chujogo rebenka bez soglasia etogo rebenka i ego rooditelei, rebenka, na kotorogo u vas net nikakih roditel’skih prav i nikogda ne bylo. No i vy doljny poniat’, chto immigracionnye zakony USA razreshaiut takomu rebenku poluchit’ immigracionnuiu vizu, poetomu trebovanie vkliuchit’ ego v zaiavku ne vygliadit nelogichnym. Ia ne ochen’ ponimaiu kak imenno gosdep soglasuet s trebovaniami zakona svoe zaiavlenie o tom, chto rebenok, ne ukazannyi v zaiavke po prichine togo, chto imel GC na datu zapolnenia zaiavki, no no utrativshii ee k momentu rassmotrenia na vizu, ne smojet ee poluchit’ tak kak ne byl ukazan v zaiavke. Dlia menia eto vygliadit protivozakonnym, i, vozmojno, eto jdet svoego chasa (t.e. suda).
Tak ili inache, schitaite chto lotereia ne dlia vseh jelaiuscih, a tol’ko dlia teh, kto smog poluchit’ soglasie rebenka ili ego roditelei na ego foto. Pri takom podhode vashi vozrajenia (chto s vas trebuiut prilojit’ foto postoronnego lica bez ego soglasia) snimaiutsia? Pochemu vam kajetsia chto ustanavlivat’ trebovanie k obrazovaniu ili staju raboty zakonno, a k fotografii postoronnego rebenka nezakonno? Eto takoe je fundamental’no trebovanie, kak i obrazovatel’noe trebovanie. Ne mojesh’ poluchit’ razreshenia na podachu foto ili ne mojesh’ dostat’ foto bez razreshenia - ne imeesh’ prava poluchit’ vizu. Mne kajetsia, vzgliad s etoi storony doljen sniat’ vashi kajusciesia protivorechia.
Vozmojno, eto trebovanie sledovalo by vnesti v preambulu instrukcii kak fundamental’noe. No po suti eto nichego ne meniaet.
Ili vas smuscaet chto eto trebovanie ne propisano v zakone, eto trebovanie ustanovleno gosdepom poverh zakona?! Nu horosho, a podavat’ vashu soibstvennuiu fotografiu - eto ved’ toje trebovanie “poverh” zakona. A esli vy ne hotite davat’ gosdepu svoiu fotografiu?! Imeete pravo rasporiajat’sia vashei fotografiei kak sami pojelaete. No i v lotereiu togda ne igraite.